New Index Reveals Actual AI Delegation Patterns in Occupations

Hyeongjae Lee, Jihyang Cheon, Lanu Kim· August 24, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • Actual AI task delegation differs significantly from theoretical AI exposure in occupations.
  • The Agentic Adoption Index (AAI) measures real-world AI integration based on agent configurations.
  • AI delegation peaks in middle-wage and bachelor-level occupations, not necessarily the highest-skilled.
  • Factors beyond technical feasibility, like work resistance or professional discretion, influence AI adoption.

Who benefits

HR/RecruitmentConsultingEducationGovernmentTechnology

Summary

A new study introduces the Agentic Adoption Index (AAI) to measure actual AI task delegation by workers, based on 53,000 agent skill specifications. It finds that occupations with high delegated exposure differ from those previously identified as "at risk" and that AAI peaks below the highest wage and education levels, suggesting factors beyond technical feasibility influence adoption.

This research introduces a new metric, the Agentic Adoption Index (AAI), to quantify the actual delegation of tasks to AI by workers, rather than just the potential for AI exposure. The AAI is derived by analyzing the semantic similarity between approximately 53,000 agent skill specifications from the Manus Skills Marketplace and 18,000 O*NET task statements, aggregated to the occupation level. The study reveals three key findings. First, the occupations showing high delegated exposure to AI are distinctly different from those previously identified as "at risk" by pre-AI frameworks, indicating a divergence between potential and actual AI integration. Second, the AAI more closely tracks what AI *could* do rather than what workers *currently* use it for, suggesting a gap between capability and adoption. Third, the AAI shows a peak below the top of the wage distribution and at the bachelor's degree level, declining at both extremes. While technical availability explains much of this variation, it does not account for the shortfall among the most educated occupations. This suggests that factors like work resisting advance specification or professional discretion over codification play a significant role in who adopts AI, highlighting that feasibility alone does not drive adoption.

Why it matters

For business leaders, HR professionals, and policymakers, this research provides crucial insights into the real-world adoption patterns of AI, helping to inform workforce planning, training initiatives, and strategic investments in automation. It challenges assumptions about which jobs are most affected by AI.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Utilize the Agentic Adoption Index (AAI) framework to assess actual AI delegation within your organization's occupations.
  2. 2Compare internal AI adoption patterns against the study's findings to identify discrepancies and opportunities.
  3. 3Develop targeted AI training and upskilling programs for occupations showing high potential for delegation but low current adoption.
  4. 4Investigate factors beyond technical feasibility, such as workflow resistance or professional discretion, that may hinder AI integration in highly skilled roles.
  5. 5Adjust workforce planning and talent acquisition strategies based on actual AI delegation trends rather than just theoretical exposure.

Original post by Hyeongjae Lee, Jihyang Cheon, Lanu Kim

"arXiv:2608.20425v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A growing literature measures how far occupations are exposed to AI, but these measures capture where AI could perform tasks, not whether workers have adopted it. We propose a new layer of exposure, delegated exposure, which records…"

View on X

Originally posted by Hyeongjae Lee, Jihyang Cheon, Lanu Kim on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses