AI Safety Verification for Aviation Collision Avoidance Systems

Thomas Stefani, Johann Maximilian Christensen, Elena Hoemann, Frank K\"oster, Sven Hallerbach· August 24, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • AI integration into safety-critical systems requires rigorous verification of data representativeness.
  • A structured process for defining and assessing operational design domain (ODD) data is crucial for compliance.
  • Statistical measures like Kullback-Leibler divergence are effective for evaluating data representativeness in large datasets.
  • This method supports a systematic "Safety-by-Design" approach for AI in regulated industries.

Who benefits

AviationAutomotiveDefenseHealthcareRobotics

Summary

This research proposes a method for assessing the representativeness of operational design domains in AI/ML-based aviation safety systems, crucial for compliance with EASA standards. It uses statistical distribution comparison methods like Kullback-Leibler divergence to evaluate data completeness for safety-critical AI applications.

Integrating AI into safety-critical aviation systems, such as collision avoidance, demands rigorous verification to meet stringent safety standards set by bodies like EASA. A key challenge is ensuring that the data used to train and verify these AI systems accurately represents all possible operational scenarios. This paper introduces a structured engineering process to define target data distributions, model parameters, and quantitatively assess the representativeness of AI/ML operational design domains. The proposed method guides developers through identifying suitable target distributions and evaluating coverage results against EASA's learning assurance objectives. It specifically examines statistical measures, finding Kullback-Leibler divergence and Cramér's V suitable for large aviation datasets, unlike the chi-squared test. Demonstrated with AI-based airborne collision avoidance using experimental data, the approach shows how statistical comparisons can bolster safety-by-design principles for AI. This contributes to a systematic AI engineering process that aligns with evolving aviation safety guidelines.

Why it matters

Professionals developing AI for safety-critical applications, especially in aviation, need robust methods to ensure compliance and reliability. This research offers a concrete framework for verifying AI system safety by assessing data representativeness, directly addressing regulatory requirements.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Identify critical operational design domains (ODDs) for AI/ML components in safety-critical systems.
  2. 2Define and model target data distributions that accurately represent these ODDs.
  3. 3Apply statistical methods like Kullback-Leibler divergence or Cramér's V to quantitatively assess the representativeness of training and verification data.
  4. 4Integrate these representativeness assessments into a systematic safety-by-design AI engineering process.
  5. 5Document the verification process and results to demonstrate compliance with relevant safety standards (e.g., EASA learning assurance objectives).

Original post by Thomas Stefani, Johann Maximilian Christensen, Elena Hoemann, Frank K\"oster, Sven Hallerbach

"arXiv:2608.20864v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers significant potential for future aviation systems; however, its integration into safety-critical applications requires compliance with the aviation sector's stringent safety standards. For AI and…"

View on X

Originally posted by Thomas Stefani, Johann Maximilian Christensen, Elena Hoemann, Frank K\"oster, Sven Hallerbach on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses

More in AI Engineering & DevTools