FLARE Framework Evaluates AI Adoption in Healthcare

Jacob Idoko, Siddhartha Paudel, Mariana Bento, Roberto Souza, Gouri Ginde· August 26, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • FLARE provides a systematic framework for evaluating AI adoption in healthcare beyond accuracy.
  • It integrates fuzzy logic, activity-based costing, and ROI analysis to quantify economic impact.
  • Economic benefits of AI depend on factors like patient volume, workflow, and infrastructure, not just algorithm performance.
  • The framework helps identify break-even points and potential ROI for AI investments.

Who benefits

HealthcareHealthTechMedical DevicesConsulting

Summary

This study introduces FLARE, a framework for systematically evaluating the financial and operational viability of AI adoption in healthcare, accounting for uncertainty. It combines fuzzy logic, activity-based costing, and ROI analysis to assess costs and economic benefits, demonstrated through a stroke pathway case study.

The integration of artificial intelligence into healthcare workflows is accelerating, yet most evaluations focus solely on model accuracy rather than the economic and operational viability of adoption in real clinical settings. To address this gap, researchers have developed FLARE, a systematic framework designed to assess the financial and operational implications of AI adoption while explicitly accounting for uncertainty. FLARE integrates fuzzy logic, time-driven activity-based costing, and return on investment (ROI) analysis. This allows it to estimate the costs associated with clinical service delivery, AI development and operation, and the economic consequences of integrating AI into existing workflows. The framework's utility was demonstrated through a case study involving AI-assisted detection of large vessel occlusion in the CT stroke pathway. The case study revealed that FLARE can quantify conventional pathway costs, AI-related expenses, and potential savings within a unified activity-based model. The analysis identified a break-even point and positive first-year ROI under typical patient volumes, emphasizing that economic benefit depends not only on algorithmic performance but also on factors like patient volume, verification time, infrastructure choices, and workflow design. FLARE offers a transparent decision-support tool for early-stage AI adoption evaluation in healthcare, making trade-offs and uncertainties explicit for stakeholders.

Why it matters

Healthcare professionals and administrators can use FLARE to make evidence-based decisions on AI investments, moving beyond mere accuracy metrics to understand the true economic and operational impact of AI in clinical settings.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Apply FLARE to pilot projects: Utilize the FLARE framework to evaluate the economic viability of new AI solutions before full-scale deployment in specific clinical pathways.
  2. 2Identify key cost drivers: Use the activity-based costing component of FLARE to pinpoint where AI development, operation, and integration costs are highest.
  3. 3Model uncertainty scenarios: Employ fuzzy logic within FLARE to simulate various patient volumes, verification times, and infrastructure costs to understand potential ROI ranges.
  4. 4Engage multidisciplinary teams: Involve clinicians, IT, finance, and operations teams in applying FLARE to ensure a comprehensive assessment of AI adoption.

Original post by Jacob Idoko, Siddhartha Paudel, Mariana Bento, Roberto Souza, Gouri Ginde

"arXiv:2608.23643v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial intelligence is increasingly being introduced into healthcare workflows, yet most evaluations emphasize model accuracy rather than whether adoption is economically worthwhile in real clinical settings. This study proposes…"

View on X

Originally posted by Jacob Idoko, Siddhartha Paudel, Mariana Bento, Roberto Souza, Gouri Ginde on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses