New Primitives Proposed for Governing Autonomous AI Agents at Runtime

Jiten Oswal, John Cadeddu· August 28, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • Traditional control models are inadequate for autonomous AI agents due to their unique characteristics.
  • Runtime governance is crucial for managing agent behavior in enterprise deployments.
  • Five primitives—discovery, identity, governance, attestation, supply chain—are essential for agent control.
  • Implementing these primitives involves trade-offs, such as performance overhead and potential availability risks.

Who benefits

Enterprise ITCybersecurityFinancial ServicesHealthcareManufacturing

Summary

This paper argues that traditional control models fail for autonomous AI agents due to their ephemeral nature, unpredictable actions, and dynamic population. It proposes five runtime governance primitives—discovery, identity, governance, attestation, and supply chain—to mediate agent actions against policy and ensure accountability.

Traditional control models, designed for human users and long-lived services, are ill-suited for governing autonomous AI agents in enterprise environments. The unique characteristics of agents—their ephemeral existence, model-selected actions, and dynamic, discovered populations—create significant governance gaps. This research posits that governing these agents is fundamentally a runtime problem, distinct from model alignment or build-time concerns. The authors derive five essential primitives necessary for effective runtime governance: discovery, identity, governance, attestation, and supply chain. Each primitive addresses a critical failure point if absent, and they are structurally interdependent. Discovery ensures agents can be identified, identity provides a verifiable persona, governance mediates actions against policy, attestation records actions for verification, and supply chain tracks the provenance of agent components. An implemented architecture demonstrates these primitives, where agent actions are mediated against policy before execution, authorized by a per-tenant action vocabulary, and recorded in a verifiable, hash-linked ledger. While effective, this approach introduces costs: enforcement points are on the critical path, identity requires sidecars, and fail-closed mediation can convert availability issues into denial-of-service. The work emphasizes that four primitives are operational in private pilots, with the fifth (supply chain) as separate tooling, highlighting the practical challenges and ongoing development in this crucial area.

Why it matters

As enterprises increasingly deploy autonomous AI agents, establishing robust governance and control mechanisms is paramount for security, compliance, and operational reliability. This framework provides a foundational understanding and practical primitives for managing agent behavior in production.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Assess your organization's current control models for AI agents to identify gaps in runtime governance.
  2. 2Implement robust identity and discovery mechanisms for all autonomous AI agents within your infrastructure.
  3. 3Develop and enforce granular policies for agent actions, mediating them at runtime before execution.
  4. 4Establish an immutable ledger for attesting agent actions, enabling third-party verification and audit trails.
  5. 5Integrate supply chain tracking for agent components to ensure provenance and security.

Original post by Jiten Oswal, John Cadeddu

"arXiv:2608.26696v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise deployments of autonomous AI agents inherit a control model built for human users and long-lived services, and the fit fails in three specific ways: agent principals are ephemeral, appearing and vanishing faster than prov…"

View on X

Originally posted by Jiten Oswal, John Cadeddu on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses

More in AI Engineering & DevTools