Subgraph Filtering Enhances Fairness in Graph Neural Networks

Haohui Lu, jiyuan Tian, Fangyu Zhou, Shahadat Uddin· August 28, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • GNNs can exhibit unfair bias due to graph topology and message passing.
  • SF-GNN mitigates structural bias by filtering bias-prone edges.
  • It combines sensitive homophily with structural propagation amplifiers.
  • SF-GNN improves fairness while maintaining predictive performance.

Who benefits

Social MediaBFSIHR/RecruitmentE-commercePublic Policy

Summary

This paper introduces SF-GNN, a lightweight, architecture-agnostic framework that mitigates structural bias in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) by selectively filtering bias-prone edges during message passing. SF-GNN improves fairness while maintaining predictive performance, offering a better fairness-accuracy trade-off than existing methods.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are powerful tools, but they can inadvertently perpetuate or even amplify unfair biases, even when sensitive attributes are explicitly excluded from node features. This bias often arises because graph topology and the message-passing mechanism can propagate group-correlated signals, especially under conditions of "sensitive homophily" where similar individuals tend to connect.Existing fairness-aware GNN methods typically apply global constraints on representations or prediction distributions, which may not directly address the local structural pathways through which bias propagates. This paper proposes Subgraph Filtering for Fair Graph Neural Networks (SF-GNN), a novel and lightweight framework designed to tackle structural bias at its source.SF-GNN identifies edges prone to bias by combining sensitive homophily with structural propagation amplifiers like hub participation and triadic closure. It then incorporates stochastic edge filtering into each message-passing step, selectively downweighting or removing these problematic edges while preserving the overall graph structure. Training also includes a statistical-parity regularizer with a warm-up schedule to stabilize optimization. Experiments on five benchmark datasets demonstrate that SF-GNN consistently improves fairness while maintaining competitive predictive performance, achieving a superior fairness-accuracy trade-off compared to other fairness-aware GNN baselines.

Why it matters

Professionals deploying GNNs in critical applications can use SF-GNN to build more equitable and trustworthy AI systems, reducing the risk of discriminatory outcomes and enhancing ethical compliance.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Assess existing GNN models for potential fairness issues and structural biases.
  2. 2Integrate SF-GNN into your GNN training pipeline to mitigate bias.
  3. 3Identify and analyze bias-prone edges in your graph data using sensitive homophily.
  4. 4Experiment with stochastic edge filtering and statistical-parity regularization.

Original post by Haohui Lu, jiyuan Tian, Fangyu Zhou, Shahadat Uddin

"arXiv:2608.26437v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph neural networks (GNNs) can exhibit unfair behavior even when sensitive attributes are excluded from node features, because graph topology and message passing propagate group-correlated signals under sensitive homophily. Existi…"

View on X

Originally posted by Haohui Lu, jiyuan Tian, Fangyu Zhou, Shahadat Uddin on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses

More in AI Engineering & DevTools