Explaining Geographic AI Embeddings for Geospatial Data

Livia Betti, Sebastian Ricke, Ivica Obadic, Adam J. Stewart, Esther Rolf· June 25, 2026 View original

Summary

This research analyzes geographic implicit neural representations (INRs) by decomposing their location embeddings into human-interpretable features like latent concepts, natural language concepts, and visual features. This reveals the geographic and semantic information captured by these general-purpose geospatial representations.

Geographic implicit neural representations (INRs) are increasingly used to map Earth coordinates to location embeddings, effectively encoding geospatial data into neural network weights. While these embeddings serve as general-purpose geospatial representations, there has been a lack of principled tools to understand precisely what geographic or semantic information they capture. This research addresses that gap by providing an explainability analysis. The study proposes a method to decompose these complex location embeddings into three human-interpretable feature types: sparse latent concepts, natural language concepts, and visual features. Sparse autoencoders are used to learn the latent concepts, while Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE) are applied with a predefined geospatial dictionary to recover natural language concepts. Visual features are extracted using saliency maps derived from CLIP Surgery. The findings demonstrate that location embeddings can be effectively broken down into these interpretable representations while maintaining high reconstruction capability. This decomposition reveals clear geographic structures such as forests, deserts, urban areas, roads, and landmarks, as well as broader biome and climate signals. This work represents a significant step towards creating more transparent and auditable geospatial AI representations.

Why it matters

Professionals working with geospatial AI, urban planning, environmental monitoring, and logistics can gain deeper insights into how their models interpret geographic data. This explainability allows for better auditing, debugging, and more informed decision-making based on AI-derived geospatial insights.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Integrate explainability tools for geographic INRs into geospatial AI development workflows.
  2. 2Use decomposed location embeddings to audit AI models for biases or unintended correlations in geographic data.
  3. 3Develop new geospatial applications that leverage interpretable features from location embeddings for enhanced decision support.
  4. 4Train data scientists and urban planners on how to interpret the semantic and geographic information within AI embeddings.
  5. 5Contribute to open-source efforts for explainable geospatial AI to foster wider adoption and improvement.

Who benefits

Urban PlanningEnvironmental MonitoringLogisticsAgricultureDefense

Key takeaways

  • Geographic AI embeddings can be decomposed into interpretable features.
  • This decomposition reveals specific geographic and semantic information captured by models.
  • Explainability tools help audit and understand how geospatial AI interprets data.
  • The method identifies structures like urban features, biomes, and climate signals.

Original post by Livia Betti, Sebastian Ricke, Ivica Obadic, Adam J. Stewart, Esther Rolf

"arXiv:2606.24997v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Geographic implicit neural representations (INRs) learn to map any coordinate on Earth to a location embedding, implicitly encoding geospatial data into the weights of a neural network. Location embeddings are widely used off the sh…"

View on X

Originally posted by Livia Betti, Sebastian Ricke, Ivica Obadic, Adam J. Stewart, Esther Rolf on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses