LLMs Evaluated for Design Structure Matrix Generation in Engineering.

Niels Potters, Theo Hofman· July 8, 2026 View original

Summary

A new black-box framework systematically assesses Large Language Models' ability to generate Design Structure Matrices from technical documentation, benchmarking them against human-validated data. The study reveals LLMs can produce plausible DSMs but are sensitive to input ambiguity and prompt formulation.

This research introduces a novel black-box evaluation framework designed to rigorously test the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in automatically generating Design Structure Matrices (DSMs). DSMs are crucial tools in systems engineering for mapping dependencies between components. The framework compares LLM-generated DSMs against manually validated ground-truth matrices, employing a comprehensive set of metrics including structural completeness, correctness, coupling density, and stability measures. Experiments conducted on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that while LLMs can produce structurally sound DSMs, their performance is highly susceptible to the clarity and consistency of the input documentation and the specific phrasing of prompts. The study identifies common failure modes such as hallucinations and abstention, underscoring both the promise and current limitations of using LLMs for automated DSM generation. The proposed framework offers a transparent method for auditing Auto-DSM pipelines, laying the groundwork for integrating LLM-based decomposition techniques into model-based systems engineering (MBSE) workflows. This provides a standardized way to assess and improve the reliability of AI-driven design tools.

Why it matters

Professionals in engineering and product development can leverage this framework to evaluate and integrate AI tools for design structure analysis, potentially accelerating complex system design and improving dependency management.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Adopt the proposed black-box evaluation framework to benchmark existing or new LLM-based DSM generation tools.
  2. 2Develop internal guidelines for structuring technical documentation to minimize ambiguity, improving LLM input quality.
  3. 3Experiment with different prompt engineering strategies to enhance LLM performance in generating accurate DSMs.
  4. 4Integrate LLM-generated DSMs into early-stage design reviews to identify potential dependencies and conflicts faster.

Who benefits

EngineeringManufacturingAerospaceAutomotiveSoftware Development

Key takeaways

  • A new framework evaluates LLM performance in generating Design Structure Matrices (DSMs).
  • LLMs can create plausible DSMs but are sensitive to input quality and prompt design.
  • The framework helps identify systematic errors like hallucination and abstention in LLM outputs.
  • It provides a foundation for integrating LLM-based tools into model-based systems engineering.

Original post by Niels Potters, Theo Hofman

"arXiv:2607.05985v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents a black-box evaluation framework to systematically assess the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate Design Structure Matrices (DSMs) from structured technical documentation. Motivated by the closed-…"

View on X

Originally posted by Niels Potters, Theo Hofman on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses