Knowledge Graphs and XAI Enhance Urban Mining Decision Defensibility

Jan Gronewald, Andreas Emrich, Nijat Mehdiyev· July 13, 2026 View original

Summary

This paper proposes four integration modes for Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and Explainable AI (XAI) to improve the defensibility of decisions in urban mining's pre-demolition assessment. It argues that combining KGs and XAI provides legibility, plausibility, sourcing, and contestability, which neither can offer alone.

This research explores how the integration of Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and Explainable AI (XAI) can significantly enhance the pre-demolition assessment process in urban mining. The core argument is that for AI support in this regulated field, the primary value lies not just in predictive accuracy, but in the defensibility of decisions—meaning they must be legible, plausible, traceable to sources, and contestable. While KGs provide structured domain knowledge and XAI offers insights into model reasoning, neither fully addresses these requirements independently. The paper introduces a complementarity-theoretic interpretation, defining four specific KG-XAI integration modes: Lifting, Constraining, Typing, and Revising. Each mode is characterized as a distinct operation that combines XAI artifacts with KG structures, unlocking unique properties crucial for decision defensibility. An example from urban mining, using a fire-door scenario and W3C Linked Building Data, illustrates how these integrated modes produce regulatory artifacts that are more robust and accountable than those generated by either technology alone.

Why it matters

For professionals in regulated industries, this work highlights how combining KGs and XAI can move beyond mere prediction to create AI-supported decisions that are transparent, justifiable, and auditable, which is critical for compliance and trust.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Identify critical decision points in regulated processes where AI support requires high defensibility.
  2. 2Map existing domain knowledge into a Knowledge Graph structure to provide context and constraints for AI.
  3. 3Integrate XAI techniques with KG data to generate explanations that are both accurate and semantically rich.
  4. 4Pilot the proposed KG-XAI integration modes (Lifting, Constraining, Typing, Revising) in a specific use case to evaluate their impact on decision defensibility.

Who benefits

ConstructionEnvironmental ServicesRegulatory ComplianceSmart CitiesManufacturing

Key takeaways

  • Urban mining pre-demolition assessment requires AI decisions to be defensible, not just accurate.
  • Knowledge Graphs and Explainable AI offer complementary strengths for this.
  • Four integration modes (Lifting, Constraining, Typing, Revising) enhance decision defensibility.
  • Integrated KG-XAI outputs improve legibility, plausibility, sourcing, and contestability.

Original post by Jan Gronewald, Andreas Emrich, Nijat Mehdiyev

"arXiv:2607.09578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pre-demolition assessment, the regulated audit process at the heart of urban mining, is an information process in which AI support must serve qualified auditors who remain accountable for the decisions taken. The relevant unit of va…"

View on X

Originally posted by Jan Gronewald, Andreas Emrich, Nijat Mehdiyev on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses