LLMs Outperform Traditional ML in Open-Ended Survey Analysis

Abdullah Akinde, Mariam Akinde, Rasheedat Emiola, Ahmed Akinsola· July 15, 2026 View original

Summary

This study compares various large language models (LLMs) against traditional machine learning for analyzing open-ended survey responses, finding LLMs consistently achieve higher classification accuracy. While LLMs excel in understanding complex patterns, they exhibit variability in justification consistency and explainability.

This research investigates the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in analyzing open-ended survey data, a task traditionally challenging to scale. Building on prior work using conventional machine learning, the study compares leading LLMs—including OpenAI's GPT series, Twitter-roBERTa-base, and Meta's LLaMA—against older ML models for tasks such as sentiment analysis and thematic classification of student survey responses. The findings reveal that current LLMs consistently surpass traditional machine learning models in classification accuracy, particularly in discerning nuanced mood and thematic patterns. However, the study also highlights a significant trade-off: while LLMs offer superior predictive power, they vary considerably in the explicitness and consistency of their reasoning and how they apply category boundaries. This suggests that while LLMs provide enhanced automation for qualitative research, researchers must carefully consider the balance between predictive strength and the need for interpretive rigor and explainability.

Why it matters

Professionals conducting market research, customer feedback analysis, or any form of qualitative data analysis can leverage LLMs for more accurate and scalable insights from open-ended text, but must also be mindful of explainability challenges.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Pilot LLM-based tools for analyzing open-ended survey responses in a specific project.
  2. 2Compare LLM performance against traditional text analysis methods for accuracy and efficiency.
  3. 3Develop clear guidelines for prompt engineering to improve LLM consistency and explainability.
  4. 4Implement human-in-the-loop processes to validate LLM classifications and justifications.
  5. 5Explore different LLM providers and models to find the best balance of accuracy, cost, and interpretability for specific needs.

Who benefits

Market ResearchCustomer ExperienceEducationPublic RelationsHR/L&D

Key takeaways

  • LLMs significantly outperform traditional ML for open-ended survey analysis.
  • They excel at understanding complex mood and thematic patterns in text.
  • A trade-off exists between LLM predictive accuracy and consistency/explainability of reasoning.
  • Careful consideration is needed to balance automation with interpretive rigor.

Original post by Abdullah Akinde, Mariam Akinde, Rasheedat Emiola, Ahmed Akinsola

"arXiv:2607.11890v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Open-ended surveys offer valuable insights, but they are notoriously difficult to analyze at scale. Building on previous work that employed traditional machine learning to classify text ("So Many Responses, So Little Time: A Machi…"

View on X

Originally posted by Abdullah Akinde, Mariam Akinde, Rasheedat Emiola, Ahmed Akinsola on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses