New Regularization Improves Retail Demand Forecast Stability Without Losing Accuracy

Jize Li, Jiani He, Dishu Yang, Dingyan Shang, Jingjing Liu, Shiqi Huang· July 16, 2026 View original

Summary

This paper introduces a training-time penalty for retail demand forecasting that improves forecast path stability without sacrificing point accuracy. The stability-aware hybrid model significantly enhances Forecast Stability Score over XGBoost while maintaining RMSE within 0.72% across various scales.

Retail demand forecasts are crucial for various operational planning cycles, including replenishment, capacity, labor, and transportation. However, traditional point-error objectives in forecasting models often fail to constrain abrupt, undesirable movements between consecutive forecasts, leading to operational inefficiencies. While post-hoc smoothing can address this, it only acts after model fitting and can degrade point accuracy. This research investigates whether a training-time penalty on within-series movement can improve forecast-path stability without materially affecting point accuracy. The proposed penalty is integrated into a temporal-structured pipeline that combines recent-demand embeddings with various features like calendar, price, hierarchy, item, and store data. The model was evaluated on selected M5 demand series at scales of 1000, 3000, and 4000 series. Results show that this stability-aware hybrid model significantly improves the Forecast Stability Score over XGBoost by 6.91%, 6.66%, and 7.68% across the different scales. Crucially, the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) changes remained minimal, within 0.72% across three random seeds, demonstrating that stability gains were achieved without a significant accuracy trade-off. In comparison, post-hoc exponential smoothing achieved lower raw movement but incurred a larger RMSE cost. These findings advocate for extending forecast evaluation beyond mere point-error minimization to include an accuracy-stability trade-off perspective, particularly for operational retail forecasting.

Why it matters

For retail and supply chain professionals, this method offers a way to generate more stable and operationally useful demand forecasts, leading to smoother planning, reduced inventory costs, and improved customer satisfaction, without compromising predictive accuracy.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Assess current demand forecasting models for forecast path stability and its impact on operational planning.
  2. 2Investigate integrating a training-time stability regularization penalty into existing forecasting pipelines.
  3. 3Benchmark the stability-aware model against current methods using both point accuracy (RMSE) and stability metrics.
  4. 4Adjust model training objectives to explicitly balance accuracy and stability requirements.
  5. 5Collaborate with operations teams to quantify the business impact of improved forecast stability.

Who benefits

RetailSupply Chain ManagementLogisticsE-commerceManufacturing

Key takeaways

  • Traditional forecasts lack stability, causing operational issues.
  • Training-time regularization improves forecast stability.
  • This method preserves point accuracy while enhancing stability.
  • It outperforms post-hoc smoothing in accuracy-stability trade-off.

Original post by Jize Li, Jiani He, Dishu Yang, Dingyan Shang, Jingjing Liu, Shiqi Huang

"arXiv:2607.13331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retail demand forecasts are reused across replenishment, capacity, labor, and transportation planning cycles. Point-error objectives do not constrain abrupt movement between adjacent forecasts, while post-hoc smoothing acts only aft…"

View on X

Originally posted by Jize Li, Jiani He, Dishu Yang, Dingyan Shang, Jingjing Liu, Shiqi Huang on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses