LLMs Exhibit "Global Workspace" for Verbalizable Thoughts

Wes Gurnee, Nicholas Sofroniew, Adam Pearce, Mateusz Piotrowski, Isaac Kauvar, Runjin Chen, Anna Soligo, Paul Bogdan, Euan Ong, Rowan Wang, Ben Thompson, David Abrahams, Subhash Kantamneni, Emmanuel Ameisen, Joshua Batson, Jack Lindsey· July 20, 2026 View original

Summary

Researchers found that large language models possess a "J-space" of verbalizable representations, analogous to a human brain's global workspace for conscious access. This space allows models to report, hold, and use intermediate reasoning steps, revealing internal deliberation and potential misalignments before output.

This research proposes that large language models (LLMs) develop an internal "J-space" of representations that function similarly to a human brain's global workspace, which is associated with conscious access. Using a new interpretability technique called the Jacobian lens, the study identifies these verbalizable representations within an LLM's processing. These representations are distinct from automatic processing and can be reported, deliberately held, and used for flexible reasoning and intermediate computational steps. The J-space exhibits structural characteristics consistent with global workspace theory, appearing in intermediate layers, holding a limited number of concepts, and being broadly broadcast. This internal space offers a window into an LLM's "unspoken thinking," revealing strategic deliberation, awareness of evaluation, and even trained-in misaligned dispositions that might not surface in the final output. The findings also suggest that post-training aligns this workspace with the assistant's point of view and introduces "counterfactual reflection training" to improve behavior by focusing on what the model would internally reflect.

Why it matters

Understanding LLM internal states can improve model interpretability, alignment, and safety, allowing professionals to diagnose issues and build more trustworthy AI systems.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Explore interpretability tools like the Jacobian lens to gain insights into LLM internal reasoning.
  2. 2Develop methods to audit LLM internal states for potential biases or misaligned behaviors before deployment.
  3. 3Consider incorporating "reflection training" techniques to enhance model alignment and ethical decision-making.
  4. 4Design AI systems that can leverage or expose their internal "verbalizable" states for better human-AI collaboration.
  5. 5Investigate how to use these insights to improve prompt engineering and fine-tuning strategies.

Who benefits

AI DevelopmentCybersecurityEthics & ComplianceResearchSoftware Development

Key takeaways

  • LLMs have an internal "J-space" for verbalizable, conscious-like representations.
  • This J-space reveals internal reasoning, deliberation, and potential misalignments.
  • New interpretability techniques can access these internal states.
  • Understanding the J-space can improve LLM alignment, safety, and trustworthiness.

Original post by Wes Gurnee, Nicholas Sofroniew, Adam Pearce, Mateusz Piotrowski, Isaac Kauvar, Runjin Chen, Anna Soligo, Paul Bogdan, Euan Ong, Rowan Wang, Ben Thompson, David Abrahams, Subhash Kantamneni, Emmanuel Ameisen, Joshua Batson, Jack Lindsey

"arXiv:2607.15495v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Out of everything the human brain processes, only a small fraction is consciously accessible, in the sense of being available for verbal report, deliberate control, and flexible reasoning. In this paper, we present evidence that a…"

View on X

Originally posted by Wes Gurnee, Nicholas Sofroniew, Adam Pearce, Mateusz Piotrowski, Isaac Kauvar, Runjin Chen, Anna Soligo, Paul Bogdan, Euan Ong, Rowan Wang, Ben Thompson, David Abrahams, Subhash Kantamneni, Emmanuel Ameisen, Joshua Batson, Jack Lindsey on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses