SGD Scaling Limits at Flat Minima: Beyond Gaussian Behavior.

Jingyi Zhang, Cheng Mao, Debankur Mukherjee· July 21, 2026 View original

Summary

This research reveals that the behavior of constant-stepsize Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) fundamentally changes at flat minima, deviating from the familiar Gaussian limit. It shows that the invariant law concentrates on a different scale and converges to non-Gaussian stationary limits for flat objectives.

For Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with a constant stepsize, the long-term behavior of the algorithm is described by an invariant law centered at a minimizer. In the context of strongly convex objectives, this invariant law typically exhibits a familiar $\sqrt{\alpha}$ scaling and converges to a Gaussian limit as the stepsize $\alpha$ approaches zero. However, this research demonstrates that this behavior undergoes a fundamental shift when dealing with convex objectives that possess "flat minima" and (sub)quadratic tails. Specifically, for such objectives, the study proves the existence, uniqueness, and geometric convergence to an augmented invariant law. This convergence is measured in a Wasserstein distance induced by an $\alpha$-dependent metric. When the minimizer has a local flatness exponent $m \ge 2$, the contraction bound changes to $1-c\alpha^{m-1}$. Analyzing the small-stepsize scaling limit, the invariant law is shown to concentrate on the scale $\alpha^{1/m}$, and the rescaled iterates weakly converge to the stationary distribution of a stochastic differential equation. This recovers the Gaussian limit for the quadratic case ($m=2$) but yields generally non-Gaussian stationary limits for the flat case ($m>2$), providing crucial insights into SGD's behavior in more complex optimization landscapes.

Why it matters

Understanding SGD's behavior at flat minima is crucial for optimizing deep learning models, as flat minima are often associated with better generalization. This research provides theoretical foundations for choosing appropriate learning rates and understanding convergence properties in complex loss landscapes.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Consider the implications of flat minima when tuning learning rates for SGD in deep learning models.
  2. 2Investigate adaptive learning rate schedulers that might better handle non-Gaussian convergence properties at flat minima.
  3. 3Apply insights from this research to design optimization algorithms that explicitly leverage or account for the geometry of flat minima.
  4. 4Be aware that traditional assumptions about SGD's Gaussian noise behavior may not hold in all complex optimization landscapes.

Who benefits

AI/ML ResearchDeep Learning EngineeringScientific ComputingOptimization

Key takeaways

  • SGD's behavior at flat minima fundamentally differs from its behavior at strongly convex minima.
  • The invariant law of SGD concentrates on a scale of $\alpha^{1/m}$ at flat minima, not $\sqrt{\alpha}$.
  • Convergence at flat minima leads to generally non-Gaussian stationary limits.
  • This research provides theoretical insights crucial for understanding and optimizing deep learning training.

Original post by Jingyi Zhang, Cheng Mao, Debankur Mukherjee

"arXiv:2607.16384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with a constant stepsize $\alpha$, the invariant law of the iterates, centered at a minimizer, describes the behavior of the algorithm over long time horizons. In the strongly convex case, this…"

View on X

Originally posted by Jingyi Zhang, Cheng Mao, Debankur Mukherjee on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses