AI is Oil, Not God: A New Perspective on Copyright

@packyM· July 25, 2026 View original

Summary

An opinion piece argues that AI should be viewed as a utility like oil, rather than an omnipotent entity, specifically addressing the debate around compensating "storytellers" for AI-generated content. The author suggests that businesses should not be taxed to protect storytellers from the narratives AI can produce.

A recent article presents a provocative analogy, asserting that Artificial Intelligence should be conceptualized as "oil" rather than "God." This perspective frames AI as a fundamental resource or utility, emphasizing its practical application and pervasive influence across industries, much like crude oil. The core argument revolves around the contentious issue of intellectual property and compensation for creators in the age of generative AI. The author contends that it is inappropriate to impose a "tax" on every American business, forcing them to pay original "storytellers" as a form of protection against AI-generated narratives. This viewpoint challenges conventional thinking about copyright and fair use in the context of AI, advocating for a framework where AI's output is not automatically subject to the same compensation structures as human-created works, thereby potentially reducing burdens on businesses utilizing AI.

Why it matters

This perspective on AI's nature and copyright implications can influence future legal frameworks and business models, impacting how companies develop, deploy, and monetize AI-generated content.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Stay informed about evolving legal interpretations of AI and copyright, particularly regarding generative content.
  2. 2Review existing content creation workflows to identify areas where AI can be integrated without incurring unforeseen IP liabilities.
  3. 3Advocate for clear and balanced AI copyright policies that foster innovation while respecting creators.
  4. 4Develop internal guidelines for the ethical and legal use of AI in content generation.

Who benefits

Media & EntertainmentLegalTechnologyPublishingMarketing

Key takeaways

  • The "AI is oil, not God" analogy suggests AI is a utility, not a creative entity requiring special protection.
  • The debate over compensating "storytellers" for AI-generated content is a critical legal and ethical challenge.
  • Current copyright frameworks may need significant re-evaluation in the context of generative AI.
  • Businesses should monitor policy discussions to understand potential impacts on AI adoption and content strategy.

Original post by @packyM

"AI is Oil, Not God "We should not tax every American business by forcing them to pay the storyteller to protect them from the story." @_benjaminparry thank you sir @WebBarr Dario’s milkshake brings all the big boys to the yard @WebBarr Wow Jesus that’s perfect @yrechtman thanks h…"

View on X

Primary sources

Originally posted by @packyM on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses