Scaling Laws for Classical ML on Tabular Data.

Kaihua Ding· July 27, 2026 View original

Summary

A large-scale benchmark study involving 127 students investigated scaling laws for classical ML models on tabular data. It found that power laws fit well, tree ensembles dominate at full data, and approximate shared exponents exist within model families, though implementation variance is notable.

While scaling laws are well-studied in deep learning, their application to classical machine learning on tabular data has been less explored, often limited to small-scale studies. This research presents a comprehensive, distributed benchmark study involving 127 students, each running a standardized protocol on multiple datasets. The study generated over 11,000 training runs across 18 tabular classification and regression datasets and 6 model families (including Boosting, Random Forest, SVM, and linear models). Three key findings emerged. First, power laws of the form error(N) = a N^(-b) + c consistently fit the learning curves, with tree ensembles generally outperforming linear models at full data. Second, within most model families, approximate shared exponents were observed across different datasets, suggesting a degree of predictive compressibility, though not full universality. Finally, the study highlighted significant replicator-implementation variance, where independent re-implementations of the same protocol, even with fixed random seeds, showed measurable differences in fitted exponents, indicating the impact of unconstrained protocol elements like preprocessing.

Why it matters

Understanding scaling laws for classical ML helps data scientists and engineers predict model performance with varying data sizes, optimize resource allocation, and make informed decisions about model selection and data acquisition strategies.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Apply power law fitting to learning curves for classical ML models to predict performance at scale.
  2. 2Prioritize tree-based ensembles for tabular data tasks when full data performance is critical.
  3. 3Account for implementation variance in ML pipelines by standardizing preprocessing and feature engineering.
  4. 4Use the provided data-requirement table to estimate necessary data sizes for target error rates.

Who benefits

Data ScienceMachine Learning EngineeringAI ConsultingSoftware DevelopmentResearch & Development

Key takeaways

  • Power laws effectively describe learning curves for classical ML models on tabular data.
  • Tree ensembles generally outperform linear models on tabular data at full scale.
  • Model families exhibit approximate shared scaling exponents across datasets.
  • Significant variance exists between independent implementations of the same ML protocol.

Original post by Kaihua Ding

"arXiv:2607.21866v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prior classical-ML learning-curve work fits power laws to tree, linear, and kernel models on tabular data, but at small scale: typically one curve, one team, a handful of cells. We present a distributed classroom-scale replication:…"

View on X

Originally posted by Kaihua Ding on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses