KANs Show Poor Performance on Embedded RISC-V Hardware

Enzo Nicolas Spotorno, Josafat Leal Filho· August 4, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) are significantly slower and less energy-efficient than MLPs on embedded RISC-V platforms.
  • KANs demonstrate poor dependability under INT8 quantization, leading to earlier trajectory divergence.
  • Parameter efficiency of KANs does not transfer to deployment cost on scalar embedded cores.
  • MLPs are a more dependable default for embedded physics-informed neural network deployments.

Who benefits

AutomotiveIndustrial IoTAerospaceRoboticsConsumer Electronics

Summary

A study evaluated Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) on RISC-V embedded platforms, finding them significantly slower and less energy-efficient than MLPs for physics-informed models. KANs also exhibited worse dependability under INT8 quantization, suggesting MLPs are a more robust choice for embedded deployments.

Recent research investigated the deployment performance of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) compared to traditional Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) on embedded RISC-V hardware. The study focused on their use within hard-constrained recurrent physics-informed networks (HRPINNs), where a neural branch learns residual dynamics. The findings indicate that while KANs offer parameter efficiency, this advantage does not translate to deployment costs on scalar embedded cores. KANs were found to be 4.7 to 14.5 times slower and consumed 4.7 to 18.7 times more energy per integration step than MLPs. Furthermore, KANs showed significantly reduced dependability under INT8 quantization, with trajectories diverging much earlier. These results suggest that MLPs remain a more reliable and efficient default choice for embedded HRPINN deployments, unless specific co-design for quantization is implemented for KANs. The study highlights a crucial gap between theoretical parameter efficiency and practical deployment performance for KANs in resource-constrained environments.

Why it matters

Professionals developing AI solutions for edge devices or embedded systems need to understand the practical performance implications of different neural network architectures. This research provides critical data on KANs' suitability for resource-constrained environments, guiding architectural choices.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Prioritize MLP architectures for new embedded AI projects requiring physics-informed models due to their superior performance and dependability.
  2. 2Conduct thorough hardware-specific benchmarking for any novel neural network architecture before committing to large-scale embedded deployment.
  3. 3Investigate quantization-aware training and specialized hardware accelerators if KANs are considered essential for specific embedded applications.
  4. 4Review existing embedded AI models to identify opportunities for optimizing performance by switching from less efficient architectures to MLPs.

Original post by Enzo Nicolas Spotorno, Josafat Leal Filho

"arXiv:2608.00737v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hard-constrained recurrent physics-informed networks (HRPINNs) embed known dynamics inside a recurrent numerical integrator and restrict a neural branch to learning only the residual dynamics that the first-principles model does not…"

View on X

Originally posted by Enzo Nicolas Spotorno, Josafat Leal Filho on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses