CoPlan Interface Boosts Trustworthy AI Care Planning

Hung Truong Thanh Nguyen, H\'el\`ene Fournier, Piper Jackson, Makoto Itoh, Shannon Freeman, Rene Richard, Hung Cao· August 6, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • CoPlan is a human-AI interface for care planning, emphasizing co-intelligence and contestability.
  • It uses role-based argument graphs, allowing stakeholders to challenge AI recommendations.
  • The system preserves human agency and clinical accountability in complex decisions.
  • CoPlan supports adaptive team recruitment, argument review, and practical follow-up.

Who benefits

HealthcareEldercareSocial ServicesPatient AdvocacyMedical Technology

Summary

CoPlan is a co-intelligent, contestable interface for human-AI care planning that uses role-based argument graphs. It allows clinicians, patients, and caregivers to inspect, challenge, and revise AI-generated recommendations, ensuring human agency and clinical accountability in complex care decisions.

AI-supported care planning holds significant promise for coordinating complex decisions across various patient needs, involving clinicians, patients, and caregivers. However, many existing AI systems present recommendations as fixed outputs, limiting the ability of stakeholders to scrutinize, challenge, or modify plans that conflict with clinical judgment, patient values, or practical feasibility. This research introduces CoPlan, a novel co-intelligent and contestable interface designed to address these limitations. CoPlan employs a multi-agent workflow where specialized AI agents generate intervention candidates and supporting or challenging arguments. Human care planners can then interact with these arguments, accepting, rejecting, modifying, or adding their own before a final plan is generated. This design fosters "co-intelligence" by combining human and AI expertise and ensures "contestability," preserving human agency and clinical accountability. Demonstrated in an aging-in-place scenario, CoPlan supports adaptive care team recruitment, role-based argument review, and practical follow-up through scheduling agents.

Why it matters

In critical domains like healthcare, ensuring AI recommendations are transparent, contestable, and allow for human oversight is paramount for building trust, maintaining ethical standards, and achieving effective, patient-centered outcomes.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Investigate integrating contestable AI interfaces into existing healthcare decision-support systems.
  2. 2Develop multi-agent AI workflows that generate not just recommendations, but also supporting and challenging arguments.
  3. 3Design user interfaces that empower human professionals to easily inspect, modify, and justify AI-generated plans.
  4. 4Pilot AI-assisted care planning tools in a controlled clinical setting, focusing on user feedback and ethical considerations.

Original post by Hung Truong Thanh Nguyen, H\'el\`ene Fournier, Piper Jackson, Makoto Itoh, Shannon Freeman, Rene Richard, Hung Cao

"arXiv:2608.05107v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-supported care planning can help clinicians, patients, caregivers, and care teams coordinate complex decisions across clinical, functional, psychosocial, and environmental needs. However, many AI systems present recommendations a…"

View on X

Originally posted by Hung Truong Thanh Nguyen, H\'el\`ene Fournier, Piper Jackson, Makoto Itoh, Shannon Freeman, Rene Richard, Hung Cao on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses