PIML Improves PHM: A Systematic Review of Physics-Informed ML.

Christopher Braun, Julian Raible, Marco F. Huber· August 12, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • PIML integrates physical knowledge into ML, overcoming data-driven model limitations.
  • A review confirms PIML consistently improves PHM predictive performance.
  • Current PIML applications are often asset-specific, lacking generalizability.
  • Future PIML research needs to focus on transferable designs and robust models.

Who benefits

ManufacturingEnergyAerospaceAutomotiveHealthcare

Summary

A systematic review of 212 studies reveals that Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) consistently improves predictive performance in Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) over data-driven models. While PIML offers tangible benefits, further research is needed for transferable designs and robust, uncertainty-aware models for real-world deployment.

Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) is vital for maintaining the reliability and efficiency of complex industrial systems. While Machine Learning (ML) has driven significant advancements in diagnostics and prognostics, purely data-driven models often suffer from limitations such as poor generalization, lack of causal inference, and limited interpretability. Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) addresses these issues by integrating prior physical knowledge directly into the ML pipeline, a strategy gaining considerable interest in PHM applications. A comprehensive systematic literature review of 212 studies investigates the application of PIML in PHM. The review categorizes approaches into observational bias, inductive bias, learning bias, and hybrid methods, and further classifies them by specific PHM tasks. Across all categories, PIML consistently demonstrates superior predictive performance compared to conventional data-driven baselines. Despite these clear benefits, the literature shows a heavy focus on specific assets like lithium-ion batteries and bearings, and a prevalence of problem-specific solutions. While PIML offers tangible performance improvements, claims regarding enhanced interpretability or causal inference often lack sufficient supporting evidence. Future research should prioritize developing transferable design patterns, establishing benchmarks for integration strategies, and creating lightweight, uncertainty-aware models robust enough for online deployment in real-world industrial settings.

Why it matters

Professionals in industries with complex machinery can leverage Physics-Informed Machine Learning to build more accurate and reliable predictive maintenance systems, reducing downtime and improving operational efficiency.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Identify critical assets in your operations where predictive maintenance can yield significant benefits.
  2. 2Assess existing data-driven PHM models for limitations in generalization or interpretability.
  3. 3Explore PIML frameworks and libraries that allow for the integration of physical laws and domain knowledge into ML models.
  4. 4Pilot PIML solutions on specific assets (e.g., batteries, bearings) to validate performance improvements.
  5. 5Collaborate with domain experts to effectively encode physical principles into ML model design and training.

Original post by Christopher Braun, Julian Raible, Marco F. Huber

"arXiv:2608.10047v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In modern industry, keeping complex systems reliable, safe, and efficient hinges on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM). Machine Learning (ML) has largely driven advancements in diagnostics and prognostics, yet purely data-drive…"

View on X

Originally posted by Christopher Braun, Julian Raible, Marco F. Huber on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses