REATS Uses LLM Reasoning for Adaptive Time Series Forecasting

Xu Zhang, Chang Xu, Hui Sun, Nan Ma, Zijian Zhang, Peng Wang, Wei Wang, Li Zhao· August 12, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • REATS uses LLM reasoning to create adaptive, interpretable ensemble weights for time series forecasting.
  • It processes both textual pattern descriptions and numerical features for better decision-making.
  • Key design choices include structured input, token-efficient supervision, and a two-stage fine-tuning framework.
  • REATS outperforms traditional ensemble methods and provides natural language explanations.

Who benefits

FinanceRetailSupply ChainEnergyManufacturing

Summary

REATS introduces an ensemble learning framework that leverages LLM reasoning to generate interpretable, sample-adaptive weights for time series forecasting models. It processes both textual pattern descriptions and numerical features, outperforming existing ensemble baselines across various benchmarks while providing natural language explanations.

Time series forecasting is challenging because no single model consistently performs best across all diverse real-world data. Ensemble learning, which combines multiple models, offers a solution by leveraging their complementary strengths. However, current ensemble methods typically rely on fixed rules or black-box models that only consider numerical inputs, missing the opportunity to use the advanced reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for more interpretable and adaptive weighting decisions. This research introduces REATS (LLM Reasoning-based Ensemble Learning for Adaptive Time Series Forecasting). REATS positions an LLM as an intelligent ensemble router. This LLM jointly processes both textual descriptions of temporal patterns and traditional numerical features. Through chain-of-thought reasoning, it generates interpretable, sample-adaptive ensemble weights, effectively deciding which base models to prioritize for a given forecast. To make LLM-based ensembling effective, REATS incorporates several key design choices: a structured input pipeline that converts raw time series into hybrid textual-numerical representations with controlled token costs, augmented with retrieved similar-sample priors; a diverse multi-row weight supervision scheme using a token-efficient percentage-table format to reduce numerical complexity and mitigate LLM hallucinations; and a two-stage fine-tuning framework combining Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Generative Reinforcement Learning from Policy Optimization (GRPO), using a reciprocal reward mapping for better sensitivity. Experiments on eight benchmarks show REATS surpasses competitive ensemble baselines, offers natural language explanations, and demonstrates strong transfer learning and out-of-domain generalization.

Why it matters

Professionals in data science and analytics can gain more accurate, adaptive, and interpretable time series forecasts by integrating LLM reasoning, leading to better decision-making in dynamic environments.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Explore integrating LLMs into existing time series forecasting pipelines to enhance ensemble weighting and interpretability.
  2. 2Develop structured input pipelines to convert raw time series data into hybrid textual-numerical representations suitable for LLM processing.
  3. 3Experiment with chain-of-thought prompting techniques for LLMs to generate interpretable reasoning for ensemble decisions.
  4. 4Implement a two-stage fine-tuning approach (SFT + GRPO) for LLMs to optimize their performance in generating ensemble weights.
  5. 5Benchmark REATS or similar LLM-enhanced ensemble methods against current forecasting solutions to assess improvements in accuracy and interpretability.

Original post by Xu Zhang, Chang Xu, Hui Sun, Nan Ma, Zijian Zhang, Peng Wang, Wei Wang, Li Zhao

"arXiv:2608.10149v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Due to the diversity of real-world time series, no single forecasting model consistently dominates across all samples. Ensemble learning addresses this by combining complementary model strengths, yet existing methods rely on fixed r…"

View on X

Originally posted by Xu Zhang, Chang Xu, Hui Sun, Nan Ma, Zijian Zhang, Peng Wang, Wei Wang, Li Zhao on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses