LLMs Struggle with Multi-Turn Information Seeking, Study Shows.

Yepeng Huang, Jiawen Zhang, Michelle Dai, Xiaorui Su, Shanghua Gao, Zi Wang, Marinka Zitnik· August 18, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • LLMs struggle to identify and ask for missing information in underspecified multi-turn queries.
  • They often underestimate the amount of information needed and fail to optimize query order.
  • Information-seeking is a distinct capability from answer generation, not well-measured by current benchmarks.
  • Improving this skill is vital for more robust and user-friendly conversational AI.

Who benefits

Customer ServiceAI DevelopmentEdTechHealthcareLegal

Summary

A new evaluation suite, MT-InfoSeek, reveals that large language models struggle to effectively ask clarifying questions and acquire necessary information in multi-turn interactions when initial queries are underspecified. Models often underestimate missing information and fail to identify minimal or correctly ordered queries.

This research introduces MT-InfoSeek, a novel evaluation framework designed to test large language models' (LLMs) ability to engage in multi-turn information seeking. The core idea is to assess if an LLM can recognize when a user's question is incomplete, identify the specific missing details, formulate appropriate clarifying questions, and only then provide a definitive answer. The suite comprises over 5,000 problems across various domains, varying in the degree of underspecification. The findings indicate that current LLMs perform poorly in this crucial aspect of conversational AI. As the complexity of missing information increases, model performance degrades significantly. While LLMs can often detect that more information is needed, they frequently misjudge the *amount* of missing data, tending to under-predict it. Furthermore, they struggle to formulate a minimal set of queries or to ask questions in the correct logical sequence, even when all necessary information is eventually provided. This suggests that the ability to strategically seek information is a distinct skill from answer generation and is not adequately captured by existing LLM benchmarks.

Why it matters

For professionals building or deploying conversational AI, understanding these limitations is crucial for designing more effective and user-friendly systems that can handle ambiguous or underspecified user requests.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Integrate explicit information-seeking modules into LLM-powered applications to guide users through clarification steps.
  2. 2Develop custom training datasets focused on multi-turn dialogues where models learn to ask precise, minimal clarifying questions.
  3. 3Implement confidence scoring mechanisms to prompt LLMs to ask for more information when their internal confidence in an answer is low.
  4. 4Design user interfaces that allow for easy user input of missing information in response to LLM queries.
  5. 5Evaluate conversational AI systems using metrics that specifically assess information-seeking capabilities, not just final answer accuracy.

Original post by Yepeng Huang, Jiawen Zhang, Michelle Dai, Xiaorui Su, Shanghua Gao, Zi Wang, Marinka Zitnik

"arXiv:2608.14808v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When a user question is underspecified, a capable model should recognize that its context is insufficient, identify the missing information, ask for it, and respond only once that information determines a unique answer. We formalize…"

View on X

Originally posted by Yepeng Huang, Jiawen Zhang, Michelle Dai, Xiaorui Su, Shanghua Gao, Zi Wang, Marinka Zitnik on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses