AI Predicts Risky Driving Hotspots Using Connected Vehicle Data

Adriana-Simona Mih\u{a}i\c{t}\u{a}, Clarence Cheung, Artur Grigorev, Tuo Mao, David Lillo-Trynes· August 19, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • Connected vehicle data can proactively identify and forecast risky driving hotspots.
  • Risky driving is quantified using g-force thresholds for events like hard braking.
  • Classical time-series models like ARIMA performed competitively with deep learning for prediction.
  • The study identified specific high-risk zones in Sydney, demonstrating practical applicability.

Who benefits

TransportationUrban PlanningInsuranceAutomotivePublic Safety

Summary

This paper uses connected vehicle telemetry data from Greater Sydney, Australia, to proactively identify and forecast near-miss risky driving events at the Local Government Area level. It benchmarks various predictive models, demonstrating the potential of IoT data for proactive road safety interventions.

Historically, road safety initiatives have been reactive, primarily relying on analyzing crash records after incidents have already occurred. A critical challenge in this field is the proactive identification of high-risk locations and dangerous driving behaviors *before* accidents happen. This research tackles this gap by leveraging connected vehicle telemetry data collected from Greater Sydney, Australia. The study quantifies risky driving using g-force thresholds for events like hard braking, harsh cornering, and harsh acceleration. Spatio-temporal heatmaps are then constructed to pinpoint high-risk zones within Local Government Areas (LGAs). To forecast these near-miss risky driving events, eight different predictive models were benchmarked, spanning ensemble learning (Random Forests, XGBoost), deep learning (LSTM, N-BEATS), and classical time-series methods (ARIMA, Exponential Smoothing, Prophet). The results showed that ARIMA, a classical time-series model, achieved the lowest mean absolute error, performing comparably to LSTM and outperforming ensemble methods. This suggests that simpler, parsimonious time-series models can be highly effective, especially when training data volume is limited. The study successfully identified inner and western Sydney LGAs (CBD, Parramatta, Bankstown) as persistent high-risk zones, underscoring the significant potential of IoT-based connected vehicle data to inform and support proactive road safety policies and interventions.

Why it matters

Urban planners, transportation authorities, and insurance companies can utilize this predictive capability to implement targeted safety measures, optimize infrastructure, and potentially reduce accidents and associated costs.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Collaborate with telematics providers to access anonymized connected vehicle data for urban areas.
  2. 2Develop or integrate systems to quantify risky driving behaviors using g-force thresholds.
  3. 3Implement spatio-temporal analysis to identify and visualize high-risk driving hotspots.
  4. 4Deploy predictive models (e.g., ARIMA, LSTM) to forecast future risky driving events.
  5. 5Use predictive insights to inform proactive policy interventions, infrastructure improvements, and public awareness campaigns.

Original post by Adriana-Simona Mih\u{a}i\c{t}\u{a}, Clarence Cheung, Artur Grigorev, Tuo Mao, David Lillo-Trynes

"arXiv:2608.16913v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Road safety monitoring has historically been reactive, relying on crash-record analysis after fatalities and injuries have already occurred. Proactive identification of high-risk locations and dangerous driving behaviour before inci…"

View on X

Originally posted by Adriana-Simona Mih\u{a}i\c{t}\u{a}, Clarence Cheung, Artur Grigorev, Tuo Mao, David Lillo-Trynes on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses

More in AI Engineering & DevTools