AI Leaderboards Fail Global South Due to Governance Gaps

Sourav Banerjee, Saikat Saha· August 20, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • Global AI leaderboards are structurally ill-suited to serving the Global South due to governance issues.
  • High-quality regional benchmarks exist but are not included in global evaluations.
  • The problem is institutional design, lacking independent governance and conflict-of-interest policies.
  • Commercial pressures favor the Global North, leaving issues affecting the Global South unaddressed.

Who benefits

AI Ethics & GovernanceInternational DevelopmentPublic PolicyAI ResearchGlobal Tech Companies

Summary

A position paper argues that global AI leaderboards inadequately serve the Global South due to a lack of independent governance, conflict-of-interest policies, and mechanisms for metric evolution. It highlights that high-quality regional benchmarks exist but are not included.

A new position paper asserts that current global AI leaderboards are structurally flawed and fail to adequately serve the needs of the Global South. The core issue isn't a lack of data or benchmarks, as high-quality regional benchmarks like IndicSUPERB for India, IrokoBench for Africa, and AlGhafa for Arabic already exist. Instead, the problem lies in institutional design: global leaderboards lack independent governance, clear conflict-of-interest policies, and mechanisms to evolve their metrics to include these regional benchmarks. Commercial pressures often correct leaderboard failures when they impact paying customers in the Global North, but the Global South lacks similar leverage. Using India as a case study, the paper reports findings from a consultation with 58 AI practitioners who consistently favored formal governance and disclosure-based conflict management. The conclusion is that the solution isn't more data, but rather better institutions and regional leaderboards with independent governance from their inception.

Why it matters

For professionals involved in AI development, policy, or global strategy, this paper highlights critical issues of fairness, inclusion, and equitable representation in AI evaluation. It underscores the need for more inclusive governance models to ensure AI benefits all regions.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Advocate for the inclusion of diverse, regional benchmarks in global AI leaderboards and evaluation frameworks.
  2. 2Support initiatives that promote independent governance and conflict-of-interest policies for AI evaluation platforms.
  3. 3Investigate and utilize regional AI benchmarks relevant to your target markets in the Global South for more accurate model assessment.
  4. 4Collaborate with local AI communities and practitioners in the Global South to understand their specific needs and challenges.
  5. 5Contribute to the development of open-source, community-driven AI evaluation tools that prioritize global inclusivity.

Original post by Sourav Banerjee, Saikat Saha

"arXiv:2608.18117v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This position paper argues that AI leaderboards are structurally ill-suited to serving the Global South because they lack independent governance, conflict-of-interest policies, and mechanisms for metric evolution. The barrier is not…"

View on X

Originally posted by Sourav Banerjee, Saikat Saha on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses