Adaptive Optimizer Selection Boosts Deep Learning Performance

Ronald Richman, Mario V. W\"uthrich· August 20, 2026 View original

Key takeaways

  • Optimizer selection is a critical hyperparameter, traditionally requiring costly exhaustive search.
  • Repeated Optimizer Resampling (ROR) adaptively selects optimizers during a single training run.
  • ROR significantly reduces training time while achieving near-optimal performance.
  • The method allows the optimal optimizer to change dynamically as training progresses.

Who benefits

AI/ML DevelopmentSoftware DevelopmentResearch & AcademiaData ScienceFinTech

Summary

This paper introduces Repeated Optimizer Resampling (ROR), a method that adaptively selects the best optimizer during a single deep neural network training run. ROR scouts candidate optimizers periodically and continues with the best performer, achieving near-optimal results with significantly less training time than exhaustive search.

In deep neural network training, the choice of optimizer is a critical hyperparameter, typically fixed before training begins. Treating it as such often requires multiple complete training runs to find the best one, a computationally expensive process that discards all but the winning model. This research proposes Repeated Optimizer Resampling (ROR), an innovative approach that allows for adaptive optimizer selection within a single, evolving training run. The method works by periodically (e.g., every 'b' epochs) having each candidate optimizer "scout" from the current model weights for a short duration (e.g., 's' epochs). The optimizer that performs best during this scouting phase is then used for the remainder of the 'b-s' epochs. If this completed segment improves the validation objective, it becomes the new incumbent. This dynamic design allows the preferred optimizer to change as training progresses, adapting to different phases of the optimization landscape. Experiments on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and two motor insurance claim-count models showed that ROR, particularly a one-epoch scouting variant, achieved performance close to the exhaustively identified best fixed optimizer while using only 24% to 35% of the aggregate training time.

Why it matters

For machine learning engineers and researchers, ROR offers a significantly more efficient way to optimize deep learning models, reducing the computational cost and time associated with hyperparameter tuning for optimizers, leading to faster experimentation and better model performance.

How to implement this in your domain

  1. 1Integrate Repeated Optimizer Resampling (ROR) into deep learning training pipelines to dynamically select optimizers.
  2. 2Experiment with different scouting durations ('s' epochs) and resampling frequencies ('b' epochs) to find optimal configurations for specific models.
  3. 3Compare ROR's performance and training efficiency against traditional fixed-optimizer approaches and exhaustive hyperparameter searches.
  4. 4Apply ROR to complex deep learning tasks where optimizer choice significantly impacts convergence and final performance.

Original post by Ronald Richman, Mario V. W\"uthrich

"arXiv:2608.18810v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An optimizer is usually chosen before training a deep neural network and then kept fixed. Treating optimizer choice as a hyperparameter could boost performance, but it requires several complete training runs and discards all but the…"

View on X

Originally posted by Ronald Richman, Mario V. W\"uthrich on X · view source

Want to go deeper?

Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.

Explore courses