Samsung Requires Health Data for AI Training or Deletion
Summary
Samsung has implemented a policy stating that users' health data will be deleted if they do not consent to its use for training artificial intelligence models.
Why it matters
This policy change impacts user data privacy and control, forcing professionals to decide between contributing to AI development or losing their health data history.
How to implement this in your domain
- 1Review Samsung's updated privacy policy regarding health data and AI training.
- 2Decide whether to consent to data usage for AI training or opt for data deletion.
- 3Back up any critical health data if opting out of AI training and facing deletion.
- 4Explore alternative health tracking platforms if Samsung's policy is unacceptable.
Who benefits
Key takeaways
- Samsung requires consent to use health data for AI training.
- Refusal to consent will lead to the deletion of user health data.
- This policy raises concerns about data privacy and user choice.
Original post by bundie
"Samsung will delete your health data if you don't let them use it to train AI"
View on XOriginally posted by bundie on X · view source
Want to go deeper?
Turn these trends into skills with Learnijoy's hands-on AI & tech courses.
Explore coursesMore in AI News & Tools
Government Should Be First Buyer for Advanced Tech
The post argues that governments should act as the initial purchasers of advanced technologies, especially before a clear market demand emerges. This strategy positions the government as a "buyer of first resort" to stimulate innovation.
Explore Grok 4.5 for AI Agent Integration
The post recommends integrating Grok 4.5 into AI agents, implying it offers significant benefits for such applications. It encourages users to try it out for improved performance.
UK Professional Services Avoid Clear Deadlines, Says Commentator
A commentator observes a prevalent reluctance in UK professional services to commit to specific deadlines, often using vague phrases like "we'll let you know when it's done" or "in due course." The author expresses frustration with this practice and calls for more direct communication regarding project timelines.